News Feed
|
|
RSS Feed |
|
If you want have last news about
no risk from bisphenol a in canned food - health canada
in your rss reader , you can use this link . |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
packaging and drinks industry dismiss calls to ban bisphenol a
|
|
|
minute levels of bisphenol a detected in drink cans pose no health risk to consumers, said beverage companies and a leading industry body as they rejected calls from an environmental group to ban the chemical. the metal packaging manufacturers association (mpma) said the report by bund, the german arm of friends of the earth, actually underlined the safety of the packaging as consumers would have to drink thousands of cans every day to exceed the established tolerable daily intake (tdi) level for bpa. drinks giants such as coca-cola and red bull also stressed that their containers and beverages were safe. the industry response came after bund released the results of tests showing bpa was found in both the epoxy linings of cans, as well some drinks, made by the likes of coca-cola, red bull and nestle. after analysing 11 drinks, bpa levels per tin ranged from 0.3 micrograms (µg) to 8.3µg. traces of the substance were found in five drinks up to a level of 3.9µg per litre, said the group. bund acknowledged the levels were not harmful in themselves but nevertheless called for a ban on the chemical as consumption of canned drinks would add to consumers’ cumulative exposure to bpa. an absurdity but the packaging and drinks industry has strongly refuted both bund’s findings and their conclusions. “the report of bund on their analysis of bpa in canned beverage products, serves only to confirm the safety of epoxy based linings for beverage cans on the basis of the very low migration figures obtained – orders of magnitude below levels considered safe by health authorities around the world”, mpma technical manager david smith told foodproductiondaily.com. he added that taking the tdi of 0.05 mg/kg bodyweight/day set by the european food safety authority (efsa) in 2007, and the highest migration figure of 3.9µg, a consumer of 60kg bodyweight would need to consume more than 1500 x 50cl cans or 2300 x 33cl cans per day for life of that product to reach the tdi. “this is clearly an absurdity,” said smith. a spokesman for coca-cola said the levels detected in its sprite drink were "many thousands of times below the tdi set by efsa" and that a person would have to drink 30,000 cans a day of the drink at 3.0µg to reach this threshold. red bull challenged the results, claiming the laboratory used by the group was “not accredited for this type of analysis.” the company said it had first commissioned analyses from an “internationally renowned and accredited laboratory” on bpa levels a few years ago and continued to receive regular updates. “the results at hand confirm that bpa from the containers used by us cannot be detected in the simulants which have to be investigated in accordance with applicable food regulations,” said a red bull spokeswoman. the industry players and packaging association all stressed that bpa has been approved for use in food contact materials by a raft of global food regulatory bodies including those in europe, the united states, japan and australasia. the mpma said the sector had given every support to regulatory bodies and that safety of their products was a prime concern. smith said: “in view of the proven insignificance of migration from metal packaging as shown in the bund report, it would be irresponsible for any type of ban to be implemented or supported, as is creating wholly unnecessary consumer concerns.”
Source :foodanddrinkeurope.com
Date :
3
March
2010
Category :
Impression And Package Service
|
|
the use of bisphenol a (bpa) in can linings is both safe and vital for food protection, a host of industry bodies and companies have said in rejecting the conclusions of a report calling for a ban on the chemical. the north american metal packaging alliance (nampa), the american chemistry council (acc), as well as food giants such as del monte, campbell and general mills have dismissed a study by the us-based consumer union that claimed potentially hazardous levels of bpa were leaching into foods from the epoxy linings of cans.
|
|
|
infants aged up to six months have the greatest exposure to bisphenol a (bpa) through polycarbonate bottles although levels are well below safety limits set by regulatory bodies, a new study has found. the researchers from switzerland added that the while the highest dose rate was “far below” the tolerable daily (tdi) intake of 50 µg/kg bw deemed safe, it was of “the same order of magnitude as recently reported concentrations that caused low-dose health effects in rodents”.
|
|
|
in its final evaluation of the chemical bisphenol a (bpa), the us national toxicology program (ntp) has expressed concerns for potential exposures to foetus, infants and children. the main conclusions of the ntp report include expression of ‘some concern’ over the potential for developmental toxicity for foetuses, infants, and children, based primarily on evidence from animal studies that would suggest that there might be effects on prostate gland and brain development, with also the potential for behavioural effects.
|
|
|
the north american metal packaging alliance (nampa) has condemned reports that it was involved in a top level meeting to revamp the image of bisphenol a (bpa) by using a pregnant woman to talk about the benefits of the substance. the us industry association was responding to an article in the milwaukee journal sentinel which claimed nampa attended a summit with executives and lobbyists at an exclusive club in washington dc last week to discuss a strategy to present their case for the continued use of the chemical, which has already been banned from baby bottles in canada and parts of the us.
|
|
|
while european and us risk assessors play down safety concerns over using food sourced from cloned animals, the fledgling industry appears set for tougher times in convincing manufacturers, according to a new survey. according to anti-gm consumer group the center for food safety, 20 leading us-based food processors including kraft foods and smithfield foods are reported to have pledged not to use products sourced from cloned animals.
|
|
|
the uk consumers\' association sought to \"name and shame\" food manufacturers who use misleading labelling this week when it revealed details of food products which are confusing consumers. the \"shamed\" products included mcvitie\'s butter puffs, containing no butter, and princes crab paste, which contains nearly 40 per cent mackerel, 20 per cent cod, and only 11 per cent crab. the association called on manufacturers to make their labels \"honest and clear\", and challenged the food standards authority \"to expose bad practice\".
|
|
|
Coca.Cola
|
PEPSI
|
Mcdonald
|
Nestle
|
Mars
|
Baskin & Robins
|
Nutrika
|
Mumika
|
Chika
|
|