News Feed
|
|
RSS Feed |
|
If you want have last news about
cloned meat divides consumers in us and eu
in your rss reader , you can use this link . |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
japanese experts say food from clones safe
|
|
|
an advisory committee for japan's food safety regulator has said that food made from cloned animals is safe to eat. in april last year, the food safety commission was asked to deliberate on the matter by japan’s ministry of health. “foods derived from cloned cows and swine, and from the offspring of clones, are as safe as food from conventionally bred animals,” said the working group in its report published today. the japanese food safety watchdog will make a recommendation to the japanese government in the coming months following its assessment of the report on whether it should lift the ban on the use of cloned animals for food. japan was one of the first countries to produce cloned animals, which are exact copies of an animal. for research purposes it has been breeding cloned cattle since 1998. us and eu perspectives cloned animals and their offspring received a positive response on their safety from the us food and drug administration (fda) in january 2008, with the regulator approving the sale of food from such animals; but the us department of agriculture (usda) was more cautious saying food from cloned animals should not be sold until further consultations took place. the european food safety authority (efsa), in july, concluded that meat and dairy products from cloned pigs and cattle are probably safe for human consumption. professor john collins, chair of efsa's biohaz panel, one of ten scientific panels that make up the regulator's scientific committee, said at the time that based on the knowledge available there was no evidence to indicate that cloned meat and dairy goods were any different from conventional products. meat sector philip hambling, food policy manager with the british meat processing association (bmpa), said that while the meat sector was satisfied that the risks to human health from cloned animal products were low or minimal, it was too early to determine exactly what the benefits of animal cloning technology for the meat industry were. he added that as the sector was consumer driven and with the general public so far displaying strong resistance to such products, more debate around the ethical and social implications of cloning is required. consumer resistance consumer resistance is bound to pose a problem, given the level of high concern surrounding attempts to introduce genetically-modified foods in europe. a survey by the uk food standards agency (fsa) showed that consumers there struggled to find any tangible consumer benefits from cloned animals being introduced into the food chain. the fsa said the respondents expressed concern that the main motive would be "financial, for biotech companies, livestock breeders, farmers or food retailers."
Source :Food Safety, HACCP, Food Quality, Food Microbiology, Hygiene
Date :
20
January
2009
Category :
Food And Health
|
|
a scientist who chairs the uk\'s independent committee on toxicity (cot) says the european commission’s (ec’s) move to ban the import of baby bottles using bisphenol a (bpa) is not based on scientific evidence, and has rejected calls to ban its use in food packaging. heinz is committed to a bpa alternative in can linings, despite insisting that minute levels are safe writing in the food standards agency’s (fsa\'s) online magazine, bite, professor david coggon said: “the ban on bpa in baby-feed bottles is not based on scientific evidence of harm, or even on a strong suspicion that it could be harmful.
|
|
|
a review of cloning is underway at the european food safety authority (efsa) following a request from the european commission for further advice on the implications of the technology for food safety, animal health and welfare and the environment. efsa has initiated a public consultation period to collate data to support the review, and the agency said that it aims to build on its july 2008 recommendations regarding clones.
|
|
|
while european and us risk assessors play down safety concerns over using food sourced from cloned animals, the fledgling industry appears set for tougher times in convincing manufacturers, according to a new survey. according to anti-gm consumer group the center for food safety, 20 leading us-based food processors including kraft foods and smithfield foods are reported to have pledged not to use products sourced from cloned animals.
|
|
|
nine months after the european food safety authority (efsa) handed in a positive safety assessment for conjugated linoleic acid (cla), the weight management ingredient will be assessed by the european commission as it continues its protracted journey to attain eu novel foods status. body shaping and toning is the predominate cla claim, although to date, efsa\'s health claims panel has not accepted cla claim-backing science february 21 will see the ec’s standing committee on the food chain and animal health (scofcah) entertain member state views on draft opinions for the use of proprietary versions of cla owned by market leaders lipid nutrition and basf-owned cognis in foodstuffs across the eu.
|
|
|
revenues were $5.7 million for the second quarter of 2010, compared to $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2009, an increase of 91%. revenues were $13.4 million for the six months ended june 30, 2010, compared to $6.5 million for the six months ended june 30, 2009, an increase of 107%. as of june 30, 2010, the company had cash, cash equivalents, and short term investments of approximately $55.4 million.
|
|
|
infants aged up to six months have the greatest exposure to bisphenol a (bpa) through polycarbonate bottles although levels are well below safety limits set by regulatory bodies, a new study has found. the researchers from switzerland added that the while the highest dose rate was “far below” the tolerable daily (tdi) intake of 50 µg/kg bw deemed safe, it was of “the same order of magnitude as recently reported concentrations that caused low-dose health effects in rodents”.
|
|
|
e. coli in ground beef, melamine in infant formula, and salmonella in peanut butter - what is next? isn’t it about time the slices of the us food safety pie were taken back from the multiple federal agencies involved and surveillance placed under one roof? confidence in a system where 15 different agencies administer as many as 30 laws is ebbing with us politicians and food companies, following the recent salmonella scare linked to eight deaths, demanding an overhaul of how the sector is regulated.
|
|
|
Coca.Cola
|
PEPSI
|
Mcdonald
|
Nestle
|
Mars
|
Baskin & Robins
|
Nutrika
|
Mumika
|
Chika
|
|